An extremely patient Dad explains to his vulgarian of a son that Santa doesn’t exist. I’m an ex-sailor and I don’t use the word “fuck” that many times in a week, much less a single conversation. You may need to pause here and there to catch everything said.
Spanish with English subtitles.
Enjoy!
Category Archives: Culture
Yes Javier, there is a Santa Claus
Toys from the depths of hell…
The whole ban on unicorn dolls seems a bit asinine as unicorns are in the Bible.
9-11…a message lost
By now, you have all been inundated with endless television and radio specials on the legacy of 9-11 and how America was changed forever. While America may have been changed, did the American people actually learn anything from that tragic day? Did WE in fact, change? Judging by the fact that numerous hate mongering religious extremists such as Perry and Bachmann exert such influence over the political and cultural landscape, it appears not. We are no different a people than we were before 9-11 and that is not a good thing.
Through the endless babbling of news commentators, pseudo-experts in terrorism, political hacks and responses from the man on the street, a still, small voice could be heard. A voice that called for reason to prevail and for a return to our roots as a nation; a nation that was founded on secular principles and the wisdom of the Enlightenment. That voice was soon squelched; smothered by paranoia, hate and ignorance.
We were all given a choice and we chose wrong as a nation. 9-11 could have been the beginning of an American Spring, a chance to throw off superstition and bigotry and embrace rational thought and humanist values. Instead, we collectively chose a path of darkness. Our descendents will look at the events of 9-11 as an opportunity wasted.
A message lost.
If you didn’t hate Mitt Romney before…
Robert Bork has been appointed by Mitt Romney to lead his campaign’s legal advisory team. To the uninitiated, Bork is one scary SOB. Read more about this interesting development HERE.
Atheist Survivalism: In the Name of Jesus

UPDATE: 08/04/2011 13:22 hours
Apparently some readers are under the impression that this post paints all Christians in a negative light;specifically that Christians are inclined to violence against those who disagree with them. This notion is absurd and I cannot determine what in this post would lead some people to this erroneous conclusion. As I noted to a reader in the comments section, all Germans did not hate Jews, not were they inclined to violence against Jews. Still, the Holocaust happened. It does not take a majority of Christians to plan and carry out organized or spontaneous crimes against humanity. As an aside, I have no doubt that if the worst does happen and I’m on the run or in a bad situation, the folks that will be helping me out or fighting by my side would more likely than not be devout Christians. When commenting, please keep this in mind.
Enjoy,
TGM
Recently, American Atheists published some screenshots (reproduced below) from Fox News’ Facebook page:

None of the comments were particularly surprising to me. I’ve come to expect this type of behavior from those who dearly love their sweet baby Jesus. What is somewhat distressing is the fact that so many from our camp are not only surprised, but confused by the violent rhetoric of the right. If we are going to beat these folks, it’s important to have a better understanding of where they are coming from and why they speak and act the way they do.
Why they hate us
There are numerous reasons why atheists as a whole are detested by the average American and I’ve come up with a short list that is by no means all-inclusive. I invite my readers to add their own insights, observations and theories in the comments section.
Reactive Backlash – The radicalism of the 1960’s, fueled by genuine domestic dissatisfaction with the status quo was co-opted by the Soviet Union via front organizations even going as far back as the 1930’s in the United States. This is not to say that all left-wing student groups were pro-Soviet or even communist, but some definitely were. That the Soviets were actively involved in shaping American policy from within is an established fact. To what extent they were involved may be debatable but how effective they were is not. While the return on the Soviet’s investment was marginal, the damage done to the reputation of the American left was enormous and its impact is still felt to this day. Atheism has been linked inextricably with communism in the American mind and for the better part of the last century no ideology has been more detested or mistrusted by the American public than communism, our war-time alliance with the Soviets notwithstanding. It was always understood by both sides that it was a marriage of convenience. It should be remembered that direct American involvement in World War 2 spanned only 4 years; the Cold War with the Soviets lasted 45 years. It was in 1954 that the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance was altered in 1954 to include the now infamous “under God” verse as a reaction to Soviet communism. So… is the left truly to blame? Some might argue so, but I see it as just another way of blaming the victim.
Nationalism – Even those who are not particularly religious have tended to connect patriotism with a belief in God. This mindset has been continuously and nefariously reinforced through official government references to the Christian deity on our coinage and currency and by mention in our altered pledged of allegiance. By giving official recognition to this god, the U.S. Government has –in direct violation of the separation clause of the 1st Amendment- given Christianity its official seal and stamp of approval. Because of the strong official connection made by the U.S. Federal government between “God and Country” an atheist living in the U.S., would typically be labeled as “un-American” and even unworthy of being considered citizens.
And then, of course there’s Madalyn Murray O’Hair – For those old enough to remember, she was the #1 poster child for atheism and separation of church and state in the United States for many decades. Was she good for atheism? She may have won some court battles, but I’d say she lost the war for America’s hearts and minds. If one looks at her television appearances or read her son’s accounts of his mother, it quickly becomes clear that she was not the ideal spokesperson for the secular cause. In fact, it wouldn’t be a stretch to say she was a PR disaster. She was, after all, known as the most hated woman in America.
How are we seen as a threat and why?
Again, this is a short list and not all-inclusive. Readers are encouraged to add to this list in the comments section below.
Greed – Where there’s religion, there’s money to be made and blood isn’t too far behind– look at Iran’s mullahs and their support for theocracy. Look at the television preachers and the megachurches with their annual revenues of hundreds of millions of dollars. Like modern day drug lords or old time robber barons they aren’t going to go away without a fight as long as there’s lots of filthy lucre involved. In fact, they actively search out and attack anything or anyone that seems to have the slightest potential to lighten their wallets. Greed is a powerful motivator and anyone who threatens the coffers of one of “God’s” messengers is asking for extermination.
Support for Women’s reproductive rights and homosexuals – If the fundamentalist right is against something; chances are that we are for it and civil rights for women and gays are usually in the forefront of the struggle.
We ruin religious holidays – Every December we get to hear about the “War on Christmas”, a myth promulgated and kept alive by the likes of Fox pundits Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly. Atheism is closely associated in the American mind with communism and commies hate Santa Claus – at least, according to Red Skelton in his much beloved Christmas skit, The Littlest Christmas Tree, a masterpiece of anti-communist propaganda. My wife had her own version of Santa growing up in the Soviet Union, he was called Father Frost and he came around on New Years, not December 25th. Of course, since we don’t belief in the whole resurrection thing, we ruin Easter as well.
And last but not least…
Fear of the outsider
As “the other” atheists are a wild card in the minds of many Americans. In fact, atheists were identified as America’s most distrusted minority according to a 2006 University of Minnesota study
MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL (03/28/2006) —American’s increasing acceptance of religious diversity doesn’t extend to those who don’t believe in a god, according to a national survey by researchers in the University of Minnesota’s department of sociology.
From a telephone sampling of more than 2,000 households, university researchers found that Americans rate atheists below Muslims, recent immigrants, gays and lesbians and other minority groups in “sharing their vision of American society.” Atheists are also the minority group most Americans are least willing to allow their children to marry.
Even though atheists are few in number, not formally organized and relatively hard to publicly identify, they are seen as a threat to the American way of life by a large portion of the American public. “Atheists, who account for about 3 percent of the U.S. population, offer a glaring exception to the rule of increasing social tolerance over the last 30 years,” says Penny Edgell, associate sociology professor and the study’s lead researcher.
Edgell also argues that today’s atheists play the role that Catholics, Jews and communists have played in the past—they offer a symbolic moral boundary to membership in American society. “It seems most Americans believe that diversity is fine, as long as every one shares a common ‘core’ of values that make them trustworthy—and in America, that ‘core’ has historically been religious,” says Edgell. Many of the study’s respondents associated atheism with an array of moral indiscretions ranging from criminal behavior to rampant materialism and cultural elitism.
Edgell believes a fear of moral decline and resulting social disorder is behind the findings. “Americans believe they share more than rules and procedures with their fellow citizens—they share an understanding of right and wrong,” she said. “Our findings seem to rest on a view of atheists as self-interested individuals who are not concerned with the common good.”
The researchers also found acceptance or rejection of atheists is related not only to personal religiosity, but also to one’s exposure to diversity, education and political orientation—with more educated, East and West Coast Americans more accepting of atheists than their Midwestern counterparts.
The changing face of Christianity
In the not-so-distant past I’ve made the argument that Christianity is different from Islam in that Christianity was softened by the influence of the Enlightenment, and that because of this influence it presents a lesser threat to overall world peace and stability. I’m revising that stance to state that this may only apply to countries other than the United States. This isn’t your grandfather’s Christianity any more. An increasingly scientifically ignorant and generally uneducated population is proving to be a ripe breeding ground for intolerance, hate and stupidity on a scale that this nation has never before seen.
Who to blame?
As numerous preachers have demonstrated, any disaster (manmade or natural) can and will be interpreted as supernatural retribution for sin. It’s already been done countless times and when it happens after a large scale SHTF event, it will no longer be just an annoyance or source of amusement to us, but a death knell. Instead of offering real solutions for redressing specific economic, political, or social grievances, Christian extremists scapegoat groups that are the outside normal political and economic hierarchies (homosexuals, socialists, atheists and liberals ) in order to stir up the anxieties, fears and anger of a gullible and uneducated population. If we go back to Europe during the Black Death it was the socially disenfranchised (Jews, the poor, foreigners) who were victimized by the powers that be. This hateful finger pointing is, in fact, a call to arms and always has been, but we’ve never had reason to take them seriously – until now.
Is the U.S. immune to extremist takeover?
As rationalists, many atheists disparage nationalism and respond to any assertion that the United States is the greatest country in the world with derision and rightfully so. However, with the majority of us, our actions (or inaction) cannot be reconciled with our declared beliefs. We criticize patriotism and nationalism, yet we behave as if the United States is somehow immune from the ills and evils that have befallen nearly every other nation state in recorded history. Whether it is simple naiveté or a belief that bad things can only happen in other countries, I don’t know. Whatever the reason, it is a dangerous and reckless state of mind to be in.
Christian extremists may be a minority, but they have a disproportionate (and growing) influence in government and the media. To get a small taste of how much trouble a handful of dedicated kooks can cause, one need only look at how in the summer of 2011 the Tea Party manufactured the debt ceiling crisis and held the most powerful nation in history hostage to its demands.
Some offer the argument that we don’t have to worry about them seizing power because the Constitution will stop them from acting up. That’s wishful thinking at best. As a group, the religious right has been hard at work over the last 3 decades rewriting history and drastically reinterpreting the U.S. Constitution to match their own twisted views of what this republic should look like. While they have experienced setbacks here and there, they certainly show no signs of giving up in their quest to turn this nation into a camp of mindless Jesus zombies. An ever-growing number of right-wing con artists such as Glenn Beck, Michelle Bachmann and David Barton are peddling an American past that never was and a future that should never be to a gullible and uneducated public and they do it virtually unopposed. They are stealing our national birthright with impunity – all while waving the flag and cramming a crucifix up our collective ass. They aren’t going to go away without a fight and they’ve all said as much, time and again.
What’s happened to hated minorities throughout history?
Well, what has happened to unpopular minorities in any society in which dogmatic and extremist ideologues exercise unrestrained power over the governed?
The Third Balkan War (1991-2001) and the Rwandan Genocide (1994) may give us an idea of what to expect should extremist elements seize power in the United States . The Rwandan genocide had its origins in tribal animosities, the Balkan War and the ensuing genocides were the result of extreme nationalism fueled by religious and ethnic hatred that had been brewing for hundreds of years. While all sides were guilty of atrocities, the overwhelming majority were committed by Christians.


As with the other Abrahamic religions, the Christians have had a horrific track record when it comes to human rights when they wield political power unopposed. One tragic example is the burning of thousands of European Jews in 1348-49 during the Black Death. Other examples are the Crusades, the Inquisition and the countless atrocities committed by Christian missionaries for centuries upon unwitting innocents around the world.
An idea in the mind of one

Despite what some of us have been told as children, it doesn’t always take two to tango. An idea in the mind of one is enough to put us in a state of war. For decades members of the Republican Party and now more recently its even uglier cousin the Tea Party, have been peddling hate and proposing violence towards those that do not conform to their idea of what makes a good American. Of course, violence is not an official party stance with either group, but their tendency to describe the conflict between left and right in bellicose terms is telling. There’s not a difference of opinion, there’s a “Culture War”. Protesters show up to Tea Party rallies with guns on their hips and signs with thinly-veiled threats scrawled on them. Even in the creation-evolution struggle, images of war are used as metaphors for the conflict. The abortion debate has also spawned a steadily growing rash of violence against reproductive rights advocates and caregivers.
While many anti-abortion organizations preach opposition to violence to achieve their goals, there are some who do so while simultaneously giving scriptural justification for it. It is a confusing message that is both disingenuous and dangerous. It’s perfectly clear from visiting many of these groups’ websites that it is the law of man and not the law of their Bible that restrains them from committing wholesale slaughter of innocents on behalf of microscopic zygotes. In a potential scenario in which there is a breakdown in the social fabric, I have little doubt as to which law these folks will gravitate to.
Also, the face of intolerance has changed complexion over the decades. Now when we see or hear hate being spewed, there is no guarantee that it is coming from a white mouth; there are a growing number of African Americans and Hispanics that are contributing to the seemingly never-ending tirade of bigotry. Hate is becoming more and more accepted, if not quite yet mainstream. Threats of violence against those who disagree with you is something to be joked about.


The Great Race
As never before in our nation’s history, reason and stupidity are in a race for supremacy, and while some take solace in the fact that atheists’ numbers are increasing, I do not feel now is the time to be complacent and rest on our laurels.
As our numbers increase, so too does the influence of the religious right. Like it or not, we are severely outgunned when it comes to both finances and sympathetic media channels. We have no equivalent to Rupert Murdoch and his media empire, and it is through the media that most of this struggle is taking place, not in the courtrooms or halls of academia. We may have the law and reason on our side, but we do not possess the ability to manipulate public opinion and shape national policy the way that Murdoch’s minions do.
The ideal antidote for our current predicament is an educated and enlightened public, and that can only come from a firm commitment by our nation’s educators to teaching critical thinking skills and rejecting the agenda of those who would force a theocracy on an unwitting population.
Such a solution, however, would take a generation to successfully implement and bear fruit. In the meantime, the forces of ignorance and intolerance are gaining ground daily. That leaves us in a rather uncomfortable and tenuous position, with a sword of Damocles handing over our heads, ready to fall at any moment.
Our opponents see this as a competition with the grand prize being the survival of one side and the complete destruction of the other. To them, victory means maintaining the status quo in some areas and turning back the clock to the Dark Ages in others. We, on the other hand are stewards of intellect, reason and hope for a better future. There’s so much more than our lives at risk if the other side wins this race.
Atheist Survivalism: Introduction
This is the first of several articles on survival in a SHTF (shit hits the fan), TEOTWAWKI (the end of the world as we know it) or a WROL scenario (without rule of law) from an atheist perspective. What has prompted the writing of this series is what I see as the low chances of survival for many American atheists in a WROL/SHTF/TEOTWAWKI scenario and the severe damage that may occur to our culture and civilization as a result of disproportionately high losses in the secular community.
This is not a basic “how to” guide for folks on how to grow crops, trap squirrels in an urban setting or perform battlefield surgery. There are numerous sites, books and training films available for free or low cost to anyone interested in acquiring survival skills. As my expertise lies in security and weaponry, I will devote an entire post in the future to discussing realistic weapons choices and defensive options for varying budgets. No mall ninja stuff, just solid, matter-of-fact observations and recommendations. Guns and gear are not the sole focus of this series, but the need for them cannot be ignored in any realistic plan for surviving in a less than hospitable environment..
It shouldn’t be necessary to make a case for the certainty of organized and spontaneous oppression and aggression committed by Christians in the event of a large-scale natural or man-made disaster in North America. Enough of them have made their intentions known and have been covered extensively by other atheist/secular bloggers as to make such an endeavor seem redundant. However, since understanding the high probability of such a threat provides the main foundational support for all later articles in the series, I will address this subject exhaustively in my next post.
If you are currently not convinced that Christian aggression is a predictable response in the event of a breakdown of society, you will see this series of articles as irrelevant, perhaps even nutty. It is my hope to convince at least a few of this opinion to reevaluate their current attitude and adjust their mindsets accordingly.
As we move forward on this topic, please understand that while the subject matter might be distressing or even depressing, the underlying message is not one of paranoid gloom and doom, but a message of hope and peace. While I am a realist in regards to dealing with the unpleasantries of life, I am also an insufferable optimist. Bad situations bring out both the worst and the best of mankind. Together we can explore how to ensure that in any scenario, the best that mankind has to offer has a fighting chance.
Pat Condell on the massacre in Norway
One of the best commentaries I’ve heard to date from any atheist on the massacre in Norway.
explaining atheism
I recently had a commenter on another blog ask me what atheists believed:
“Godless Monster, you don’t believe in the occult? That’s consistent, but I don’t know what atheists believe and don’t believe.”
At first I was a little surprised, but I shouldn’t have been. I have long realized that many (most?) people have a false impression or understanding of what atheism is. In fact, so many of the nasty notions that people have about atheists can be attributed to them not understanding what atheism is in the first place.
I gave the gentleman a short and long answer and hopefully that will have broadened his horizons just a tad. I’m not inclined to be patient when confronted with willful ignorance, but sometimes I’m too quick to label simple ignorance as willful ignorance and end up slamming the door on an opportunity to teach others about rational thought and secularism. I’ve tried to be more mindful of the fact that I was once ignorant of what atheism is and just as important…isn’t.
If a religious person asked you how you’d explain atheism would you take the time to teach them? If not why? If so, how? What would you tell them?
to be or not to be…an atheist

A post on Atheist Revolution touches on the subject of choice and atheism. Specifically, vjack asserts (correctly) that atheism is not a choice.
Still, choice is an important factor in the process that leads to atheism. At some point in the lives of those who are free-thinkers, we made a choice – a choice to follow where the evidence takes us and not where emotion may lead. A choice was made to embrace reality as we interpreted it or understood it through evidence. Once we committed to reality, atheism was inevitable. At that point, it cannot be a choice. It just IS.
The religious faced the same dilemma we did and took another path. The easy path, the path of least resistance and good intentions. But, as Saint Bernard of Clairvaux wrote, “L’enfer est plein de bonnes volontés et désirs” (hell is full of good wishes and desires).
To make a conscious decision to forgo reality is to knowingly squander the good fortune that has been bestowed on each and every one of us. That we are alive at all is testament to the fact that we have won the genetic lottery and are the benefactors of billions of years of evolution. Each and every one of us are the end result of the living, struggling, suffering and dying of an untold number of organisms. By denying reality, the religious deny the contributions of our ancestors, and through the commission of that misdeed they contribute to the unnecessary emotional and intellectual crippling of their descendants.
If for no other reason than this, there is a stench of evil about religion, even at its most benign.
ICR Article Attacks Atheists
Normally, the Institute for Creation research (the ICR) flies under the radar, quietly churning out anti-science propaganda in the hope that with enough of their crap thrown out there, some of it will find a willing and blank mind to stick to.
It seems, however, that there might have been a shortage of material recently for the scientifically challenged scribblers of the ICR, as they made a brief foray into the area of public debate and comment on the recent vandalism of atheist bus signs and billboards.
Whenever a religious extremist or apologist starts a sentence with the words, “We don’t condone…” or “…should not be condoned…” you know that qualifiers such as, “but”, “yet” or “however” are not far behind. Ms. Dao was true to form in her formulaic approach to excusing crime in the name of her god.
In an article for the ICR entitled, Atheist Ads Vandalized, Christine Dao makes an emotional appeal for excusing the vandalism of private property and stifling of free speech. She starts by stating:
“While vandalism should not be condoned, these recent events shed light on what some Americans will do when they feel that their freedom of speech is threatened.”
She goes further to state that Christians are only reacting in defense to overt attacks by atheists with alarmist rhetoric:
“…the concerted effort of atheist groups to stop religious Americans from freely exercising their religion…militant atheists increasingly seek to shackle the beliefs of their fellow citizens…”
In other words, “This is naughty, but we sure can understand why it would happen. We don’t condone, but we sure do not condemn. Just read between the lines..wink, wink, nudge, nudge.”
The final sentence of Ms. Dao’s apology for terror is a real kicker:
“It is perhaps not surprising that some of those fellow citizens object.”
“Object” is an interesting way to describe the criminal act of vandalism and the aggressive pursuit of silencing opposing points of view.
Still reeling from a recent legal defeat in which their request for a state certificate of authority to offer a master’s degree in science education from its graduate school was denied, the ICR is looking for a target to lash out at. What better target than the most demonized demographic of the United States, the atheists?
Perhaps atheists are the ones who shouldn’t be surprised. I know I’m not. We’ve all seen this type of behavior displayed time and again by “moderate” Muslims when they supposedly speak out against atrocities committed in the name of the “Religion of Peace”.
Apologies and condemnations that are qualified with statements blaming the victim are not only meaningless as bridge builders, they are not-so-subtle threats to the intended target audience.
Ms. Dao however, doesn’t even pretend that she has an interest in dialogue, understanding or peace. Apparently, as far as the ICR is concerned, the gloves are off and they’re out for blood. Atheist blood. There are Christians out there clamoring for the persecution of those who would stand for freedom and the ICR not only doesn’t condemn this…it understands it.
A threat has been made and some of us take these kinds of threats seriously. We’ll be keeping a closer eye on you and the ICR, Ms. Dao.
*Video* from SCA & TGM says, “Less Talk & More Action, Mr. President”
“If you can’t multi-task, then you’ve got no business being President of the United States of America.” That was the message sent loud and clear to Senator John McCain when he was rightly criticized for stopping his campaign, canceling a debate with Obama and running to D.C. to “handle” the (then new) economic meltdown during the last Presidential race. Most saw it as an attempt to demonstrate his ability as a leader. Of course, it backfired horribly and the Democrats gave him hell over it for the rest of the campaign. Next to taking on the idiot Palin as his running mate, this was probably one of the most damaging stunts of Senator McCain’s run for the Presidency.
If elected,however, he might not have done much worse than the current suit occupying the Oval Office. It appears the inability to multi-task wasn’t limited to one candidate only. Lots of promises have been made by Obama in regards to gay (human) rights and to turning back the aggressive advance of religion into government, but little has actually been done.
Do what you said you were going to do Mr. President. Stating that you’ve got a full plate or other more important or pressing issues to deal with is no excuse. We elected you to make some changes. Start making them. Now. Lead, follow or get out of the way.
Mr. Faircloth of the SCA has a few things to say about the subject as well:
A Woman’s Place
“Where are you from?” the old man asked in Arabic as I walked by his metals workshop. “Amrikiya” I replied, “American.” He squinted his eyes and ran back into his shop.
“Fuck” I muttered to myself. I knew what that was all about. My sister, of course was oblivious.
“Could you at least pretend to give a damn about things and walk next to me?!” I asked. “Everyone is fucking staring.”
I was about 4 paces behind her, walking uphill on the outskirts of the small town that my father’s family hails from in Hezbollah controlled territory in southern Lebanon. We may as well have been nude.
As she was in the, “I am woman, hear me roar” mode, slowing down wasn’t an option and it wasn’t going to happen. “Stop being so paranoid, you’re always so paranoid, “she snapped. The Lebanese version of the Jewish American Princess.
I’d spent some time in the Middle East as a young man in the military and later as a private soldier and the last thing I wanted was to stick out like a sore thumb and have some militia type stop me, look at my passport and ask a million and one questions about my work in other Arab countries.
A Renault Kangoo occupied by two men drove slowly by us, stopped, and then backed up. It was an unmarked Hezbollah security patrol. The bearded driver stayed in the vehicle, while the clean-shaven passenger got out and asked us for our passports and inquired as to what we were doing and who we were staying with. I dropped a few names and pointed in the direction of my aunt’s house. Satisfied with my answers; he apologized for the inconvenience and let us go.
I breathed a huge sigh of relief. It could have been Palestinians, in which case I would have been fucked.
I got on my sister’s case, but she wasn’t going to admit she was out of line. “You’re just paranoid…”
“If she had just done as all women here do and walked behind me, this wouldn’t have happened”, I thought. I blamed her, not the stupid culture that made a problem out of nothing in the first place.
After getting back to my aunt’s house I was famished and tried to make myself something to eat.
“La, la, la, la, la!!!!” (No, no, no, no, no!!!) My aunts were in hysterics. I had almost broken that unbreakable rule and intruded on their territory, thus negating their purpose in life. I had to sit in the living room and wait patiently while they made my snack and waited on me hand and foot. Laundry? Nope, I couldn’t do my own laundry, either. Pick up my dish after a meal at another relative’s home to take it to the sink? You’d have thought I pulled my pants off. As a guy I couldn’t shake hands with a woman that wasn’t a close blood relative. And Lebanese are fairly liberal when it comes to this kind of thing…
When I look back at my travels throughout the Middle East, I realize that as a man, I had my place defined for me just as much as the women had their place defined for them. It can be rightfully said that men there have it much better than women, but to my westernized sensibilities, this comes at too dear a price.
I can’t help but feel that as men in Muslim cultures have made cages for women, they’ve forged chains for themselves in the process.
Save the Gays? Bullsh*t
I go on some other atheist blogger’s sites and am amazed at the number of posts that are devoted to the topic of gay rights. While I wholeheartedly support gay marriage and gay rights overall, I am often at a loss to understand what I can only call an obsession that some atheists have with gay issues. Upon further introspection, it’s really not so much that they are covering gay issues, but that they are constantly portraying them as victims. They’re not just victims; they’re heroes and they are making changes. Hell, they’ve been effective advocates for change in the U.S. of A. since the 1960’s.
The importance of gay rights is not lost on me, but I happen to believe that it is atheists who need them, not the other way around. As far as sheer buying power and economic influence, gays have far more clout than the atheist crowd. And yes, I am aware of the not insignificant amount of demographic overlap. Still, I don’t see that there is much we can do for the gay cause beyond encouraging public awareness, and gay organizations already do that for themselves and they do it much more effectively than we can.
Instead of approaching the gay community with condescension, perhaps a little humility would be in order. There’s a lot of lip service given to the fact that they were trail blazers for civil rights, but many of us continue to treat them as if they are victims only, and not the ready-made source for intelligence networks, experience, resources and financial support that they are. We can stop feeling sorry for them and start treating them as mentors. I think the time for the pity party to end is long overdue.
They’re gay, not helpless ninnies…and we need them.
Postscript: Need we any more proof that gays are more mainstream than atheists than the number of Gay Pride parades around the country this weekend?
“I will chop your heads off!!”
There are few things in life (aside from Fox News) that give me a reason to laugh. Axe Cop is one of them. Created by a team of brothers, Axe Cop is written by 6-year-old Malachai (the comic started when he was 5) and is drawn by his older brother, Ethan. Click on either of the pics below to be taken directly to a listing of episodes. Great stuff.









